top of page

Stress Definitions

Working at Micro and Macro Scales

StratEko and the Context of Strategic Planning

Information Foundations

Privacy Policy

About Founder​

StratEko is a constraint-first risk analysis tool designed to test whether real projects, policies, or investments remain feasible when climate, energy, financial, and institutional limits are treated as binding rather than abstract. Instead of producing reassuring narratives or open-ended scenarios, it identifies where systems break first, which options collapse, and which assumptions no longer hold. Removing options is a valid analytical outcome, and clear failure is treated as more informative than plausible success.

 

Stress Definitions

StratEko Stressors are structural risks that condition feasibility. StratEko models how projects, policies, and investments behave as structural pressures intensify. Each slider represents a channel of constraint. The setting reflects escalation relative to current conditions — not importance.

 

Energy Reliability & Cost Risk

The stability of electricity supply and energy pricing. Rising energy risk affects electrification, manufacturing margins, digital infrastructure, and operating predictability. Under escalation:

  • Grid interruptions increase

  • Power costs become volatile

  • Electrified systems face reliability stress

  • Energy-intensive projects lose margin

 

Capital Tightening Risk

Credit availability and finance conditions. The availability and price of capital across public and private markets.

As capital tightens:

  • Lending standards rise

  • Refinancing becomes difficult

  • Marginal real estate and infrastructure projects stall

  • Venture and growth funding slows

 

Climate / Ecological Risk

Climate and environmental limits. Physical constraints imposed by flood risk, wildfire exposure, water scarcity, heat stress, or ecological degradation. As ecological risk escalates:

  • Insurance availability contracts

  • Site feasibility narrows

  • Infrastructure resilience costs rise

  • Long-term asset values become uncertain

Governance & Policy Instability Risk

Regulatory stability and permitting consistency. The predictability and continuity of institutional decision-making.As instability rises:

  • Permitting timelines lengthen

  • Policy reversals increase

  • Long-term investments face uncertainty

  • Compliance costs expand

Geopolitical Restriction Risk

Sanctions and cross-border restrictions. The degree to which geopolitical tensions affect trade, capital flows, and technology transfer. As restrictions intensify:

  • Supply chains fragment

  • Export controls expand

  • Tariffs and sanctions disrupt cost structures

  • Strategic realignment replaces efficiency

Supply Chain Disruption Risk

Labor, materials, and build timing. The reliability of inputs required to execute projects.

As disruption rises:

  • Lead times lengthen

  • Skilled labor becomes scarce

  • Materials pricing becomes volatile

  • Construction schedules slip

Public Finance Stress

Government capacity and infrastructure funding. The fiscal health of public institutions.

As public finance stress increases:

  • Infrastructure spending slows

  • Maintenance is deferred

  • Subsidies shrink

  • Emergency response capacity narrows

 

Automation / Cognitive Displacement

Technology-driven disruption. The degree to which automation, AI, or digital systems displace labor or reconfigure industries. As displacement accelerates:

  • Workforce realignment pressures rise

  • Skill mismatches expand

  • Certain roles compress rapidly

  • Institutional adaptation lags technology

Demand Fragility Risk

Buyer affordability and absorption. The resilience of end-market demand. As demand fragility rises:

  • Buyers delay commitments

  • Absorption rates slow

  • Financing assumptions fail

  • Inventory builds

 

StratEko does not forecast events. It examines how systems behave when constraints tighten.
Significance emerges from interaction, context, and sequence — not from any single channel.

StratEko at Micro and Macro Scales

StratEko applies the same constraint-first logic to both local decisions and large-scale systems. What changes is the scope of the constraints—not the reasoning.

 

At the micro scale, StratEko evaluates place-specific choices such as redeveloping a single site or launching a local economic initiative. It treats factors like environmental risk, zoning, infrastructure capacity, labor markets, and local saturation as hard limits. In many cases, the correct outcome is not a “best option,” but a finding that reuse, expansion, or intervention is not viable.

 

At the macro scale, StratEko analyzes national or regional pathways—industrial strategy, energy transitions, or trade positioning. Here, constraints take the form of institutional capacity, fiscal limits, geopolitical alignment, and external dependency. StratEko identifies which ambitions are structurally feasible and which collapse under real-world conditions.

 

Across both scales, StratEko focuses on what can survive contact with constraints. ​​StratEko is most useful early in the planning and design process, when projects, policies, or investments are still malleable and walking away is possible. It is designed for decisions shaped by place, climate, energy, institutions, and capital—where constraints dominate intent and failure is often under-acknowledged. Its purpose is not to optimize proposals, but to identify when and why they no longer hold.

Scenario Planning: A Brief Lineage

 

 

Scenario planning emerged during the early Cold War, when organizations such as RAND explored “alternative futures” to understand nuclear escalation and geopolitical shock. Thinkers like Herman Kahn shifted the focus from prediction to structured imagination—constructing causal chains of events to test how systems might behave under stress. The goal was not to forecast accurately, but to widen what decision-makers were prepared to consider.

 

In the 1970s, Royal Dutch Shell institutionalized scenario planning within corporate strategy. Led by Pierre Wack and Arie de Geus, Shell identified key driving forces, tested assumptions, and developed divergent yet plausible futures. Their work helped executives recognize structural signals—most famously around the oil shocks—before competitors did. Scenario planning became a disciplined way to confront uncertainty rather than extrapolate trends.

 

In parallel, figures such as Stewart Brand and the Global Business Network extended scenario thinking into ecological, technological, and civilizational domains. Uncertainty was treated as systemic: environmental limits, technology shifts, geopolitics, and institutional trust were understood as interacting forces rather than isolated risks.

 

StratEko sits within this tradition. It applies structured uncertainty to contemporary stressors—financial, geopolitical, technological, ecological, and institutional—using an interactive interface. Rather than predict outcomes, it explores how causal pressures combine, compound, and reshape feasibility across contexts.

StratEko's Information Foundations

StratEko uses the GPTmodel’s broad exposure to global economic, demographic, environmental, and geopolitical information to support plausible scenario reasoning. This includes patterns reflected in widely available international publications (e.g., UN, World Bank, IMF, IEA, IPCC). StratEko does not quote, cite, or access live proprietary data. Scenarios are interpretive outputs, not summaries of any specific document.

Privacy Policy

StratEko is a no-login, no-storage scenario tool. We do not save or sell your data.

 

StratEko does not create user accounts or store your scenario inputs. Anything you type or upload is used only to generate a scenario and is not saved once you leave the page. We do not use your content for AI training, advertising, or profiling.

 

Because the site is hosted on Wix, Wix automatically collects basic technical data (such as IP address, device type, and pages visited) for security, performance, and site functionality. These analytics are aggregated and do not identify you personally. Essential Wix cookies may be used for site operation.

 

StratEko uses third-party services such as OpenAI (for scenario generation) and Google Maps (for mapping). These services receive only the information needed to perform their functions and do not receive personal identifiers from us.

Definitions
Strat Plan Context
MicroMacro
Info Foundations
Privacy

Eric Carlson - Founder, StratEko

About Eric

Eric Carlson is an environmental strategist, technology innovator, climate investor, and international consultant with decades of experience advising organizations like the World Bank, UNEP, and the U.S. Department of Energy. As the founder of StratEko, Eric brings together a lifelong commitment to systems thinking, sustainability, and foresight. Drawing on his background in environmental planning, international development, and AI powered analysis, Eric created StratEko to help leaders navigate complex geopolitical, economic, and environmental futures. His vision is to make structured scenario planning accessible, insightful, and actionable - combining human context with the power of AI. His academic background includes advanced degrees from the University of Washington and Yale University.

Contact the StratEko Team

Thanks for submitting!

bottom of page